Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Navigating Triangular Setoff Through Safe Harbors

By Jeff J. Friedman and John J. Ramirez
June 02, 2015

Section 553(a) of the Bankruptcy Code preserves a creditor's prepetition right to setoff. Courts have strictly construed Section 553(a) to limit the preservation of setoff rights to claims and debts that arose prior to the commencement of the debtor's bankruptcy case. Courts have also strictly construed the mutuality requirement in Section 553(a) to require that debts be due to and from the same two parties in the same legal capacities. This construction has been routinely held to prevent what has been labeled as “triangular setoff” with respect to a debtor in bankruptcy.

Virtually all definitions of setoff provide for the netting of debts or claims and counterclaims between the same two parties acting in the same legal capacities. What is typically meant by the term “triangular setoff” is a contractual agreement where the debtor has agreed that a debt owed to the debtor by party A, can be applied to satisfy a debt owed by the debtor to party B. As one court observed, “outside of the bankruptcy context, ' [such a triangular setoff provision] without a question is [] valid and enforceable ' .” In re Lehman Brothers Inc., 458 B.R. 134, 139 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011) ( Lehman/UBS ).

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.