Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Statute Mandating Communication with Patient Gives Her No Standing to Sue
A court in Hartford, CT, has determined that, although under state law (Connecticut General Statutes (C.G.S.) ' 38a-503(c)), doctors are required to give patients information about the density of their breast tissue, a doctor's failure to do so does not give the patient a statutory cause of action against him. The plaintiff in Guiliano v. Jefferson Radiology alleged a breach of C.G.S. ' 38a-503(c) by her doctor, and she sought damages from him and his employer based on that breach. The defendants moved to strike, and the court complied with their request after finding that the statute did not establish a private right of action. The court did point out, however, that the plaintiff is free to re-plead to allege failure to communicate with her about her breast tissue density ' provided she does so without reference to the statute.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.