Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
New York Federal Court Dismisses Copyright Plaintiff's Suit Against Former Lawyers
In 2003, Carla Boone sued artists Fabolous and Pharrell Williams and related entities by alleging the defendants' song rap song “Young'n (Holla Back)” infringed on the song “Holla Back” to which Boone's company had the rights. At the New York federal district court level, Boone was represented by what today are two firms: Codispoti & Associates and Mancinelli & Associates. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted pre-trial summary judgment for the Fabolous defendants. The district court determined: ” The presence of the phrase 'holla back,' rapped in an eighth note, eighth note, quarter note rhythmic pattern in the hook of each song is too common to be protectable.” Boone v. Jackson, 03 CV 8661 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). Boone represented herself pro se on appeal; the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. Boone v. Jackson, 206 Fed. Appx. 30 (2d. Cir. 2006). In 2015, Boone sued her former lawyers in the Southern District, including by alleging fraud. She claimed the lawyers falsely led her “to believe that a [j]ury [t]rial would occur,” that they knew or should have known most copyright infringement cases don't reach the trial stage. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield dismissed Boone's suit against the lawyers. First, District Judge Schofield noted that “the statements about the likelihood of defeating summary judgment and obtaining a jury trial were 'mere expression[s] of future expectations' that did not constitute actionable fraud.” The district judge went on to find that, even if Boone's claim was analyzed as one for malpractice, “the Complaint fails to allege negligence as it 'essentially alleges ' an “error of judgment”' '.” In any case, a malpractice claim would be time-barred by New York's three-year statute of limitations. “Here,” Judge Schofield observed, “Defendants ceased their representation of Plaintiff after the Copyright Action was dismissed by Memorandum Opinion and Order dated June 30, 2005, and therefore any claim for legal malpractice against Defendants accrued by that date.” Boone v. Codispoti & Associates P.C., 15 Civ. 01391. '
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.