Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Fair Use of Abbott and Costello “Who's on First?” Comedy Routine
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that inclusion of about one minute of the famous Abbott and Costello “Who's on First?” comedy routine in the theatrical dark comedy Hand to God was a copyright fair use. TCA Television Corp. v. McCollum, 15 Civ. 4325. District Judge George B. Daniels observed the defendants “characteriz[e] the use as 'part of a sophisticated artistic expression.' Specifically, Jason, the play's shy and repressed main character, finds a creative escape from his religious small-town life through his [demonic] hand sock-puppet, named Tyrone,” with whom Jason reenacts the comedy routine segment. District Judge Daniels went on to find a transformative use of the original routine, in noting: “Although Plaintiffs contend that Defendants' use of the Routine does not 'add[] anything materially new or provide[] a different aesthetic,' and claim that the actor playing Jason 'merely re-enact[s] the [R]outine as Abbott and Costello performed it,' the tone of the new performance is markedly different. Hand to God uses the Routine to create context and 'a background for the ever more sinister character development of Tyrone.” The district judge then found: “It is the performance through the anti-hero puppet, Tyrone, that, according to Defendants, creates new aesthetics and understandings about the relationship between horror and comedy that are absent from Abbott and Costello's performances of the Routine '.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.