Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The courts have taken varying approaches to determining the basis of stock that is received by an insurance policyholder in exchange for the policyholder's surrender of membership rights in a mutual insurance company, in a “demutualization” transaction. While this may seem to be a narrow and abstruse question, the approaches taken by the courts may have application in other areas of the tax law affecting analogous transactions.
Most recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Dorrance v. United States, Docket Nos. 13-16548, 13-16635 (Dec. 9, 2015), reversing Dorrance v. United States, 111 AFTR 2d 2013-1280 (D. Ct. Arizona), reversed the district court decisions in that case, agreed with the government position that the policyholder's basis in the stock did not include any part of the premiums paid by the policyholder for insurance, and concluded that the entire proceeds from the subsequent sale of the stock by the policyholder constituted gain. (The decisions of the district court in Dorrance in 2012 and 2013 were discussed by the authors in an earlier article in this newsletter's ALM sibling, New York Law Journal. See, E. Pisem and D. Kahen, “Diverse Approaches to Allocation of Basis in Demutualizations,” N.Y.L.J., April 18, 2013.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.