Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

Mid-December Wave of Hospital FCA Settlements

On Dec. 18, 2015, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced two separate settlements reached with hospitals that violated the False Claims Act (FCA). The first instance involved 21st Century Oncology, an integrated cancer care company headquartered in Fort Meyers, FL, which agreed to pay $19.75 million to resolve the allegations that four of its urologists routinely and continually ordered tests that were not medically necessary, but merely increased profits. The DOJ asserted that the hospital not only knew of the FCA violations, but encouraged them by offering doctors bonuses that were contingent upon the number of unnecessary tests referred to the 21st Century laboratories. The lawsuit was filed by a whistleblower ' a 21st Century medical assistant ' under the qui tam provisions of the FCA, whereby a private party is permitted to bring a suit on behalf of the government and share in any recovery. In this case, the medical assistant is expected to receive $3.2 million for her role.

The second settlement announced by the DOJ in December concerned 32 hospitals, spanning 15 states, all of which agreed to pay a collective $28 million related to improper Medicare billing for kyphoplasty procedures. These minimally invasive procedures ' typically done on an outpatient basis ' were billed at a far more costly inpatient rate, which significantly increased the hospitals' Medicare billings. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General and head of the DOJ's Civil Division, stated that such unlawful actions “wastes the country's vital health care dollars.” He further offered that “[t]he Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that Medicare funds are expended appropriately, based on the medical needs of patients rather than the desire to maximize hospital profits.” All but three of the hospitals settled after they were named as defendants in qui tam lawsuits. In addition to this settlement, in May 2008, the DOJ settled with Medtronic Spine LLC (the corporate successor to Kypohon, Inc.) for $75 million for the company's role in counseling hospital providers on sales and pricing strategies to increase profits by defrauding Medicare, in large part by performing kyphoplasty procedures on an inpatient, rather than outpatient, basis. These tactics ultimately allowed the company to price its products with an over 80% profit margin.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.