Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The employment law community remains abuzz with predictions as to exactly when the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) will issue its Final Rule setting the new minimum salary level for employees to qualify for “white-collar” exemptions to the Fair Labor Standards Act's (FLSA) overtime requirements. The salary level proposed in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register in July 2015 would more than double the current salary level for “white-collar” employees to be exempt from the FLSA's overtime requirements. Such an increase in the salary level would have wide-reaching implications for employers and employees alike. DOL Secretary Thomas E. Perez has predicted that, “on an annual basis, workers will get roughly $1.2 to $1.3 billion in additional wages as a result of this rule.”
While the Office of Management and Budget released a timetable Nov. 19 indicating that the Final Rule would issue by July 2016, Perez has been quoted in recent media reports stating that the DOL is planning to publish the Final Rule this spring. This is in contrast to widely disseminated media reports of comments made by Solicitor of Labor M. Patricia Smith at the American Bar Association's Labor and Employment Law Conference in early November that the Final Rule would be released in “late 2016.” Although it is impossible to fully predict when the Final Rule will be published, employers should be proactively assessing the DOL's NPRM and its impact on their workforce and work flow well in advance of the publication of the Final Rule.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.