Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In this three-part series, we are examining the highly complex dispute resolution issues that companies face when engaging in cross-border transactions. The unique nature of these multi-jurisdictional litigation issues can stymie even the most experienced counsel, and a keen understanding of the laws and issues behind such matters is vital to a successful result.
This series began with an examination of the complexities surrounding the post-judgment collection process. In this second part, we explore the information-gathering phase during the litigation process, and how litigants must navigate through the turbulent trans-jurisdictional waters to prepare their case. In part three, we will discuss how to infuse predictability into the cross border transaction through draftsmanship and forward thinking.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.