Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra (BPO) had little choice but to fire its principal oboist for his repeated clashes with the symphony's conductor, other musicians and staff, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York found in upholding the “fair and just” findings of an arbitrator. Roy v. Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra Society Inc., 15-CV-0283.
District Judge Michael Telesca wrote that the arbitrator had ample evidence to justify the dismissal of oboist Pierre Roy in July 2012. It was the second time Roy had been fired in less than two years due to abrasive behavior. Fellow musicians complained that Roy played off-tempo or off-pitch at rehearsals to throw them off, mocked his colleagues and engaged in “intimidating, abusive and disruptive behavior” toward symphony staff and other musicians, according to Judge Telesca's decision.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.