Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A number of conflicting decisions over the past year and a half concerning whether provisions prohibiting waiver of duties or liabilities under the New York Franchise Act prohibit franchisors from interposing franchisee “non-reliance” franchise agreement disclaimers when confronting fraud actions brought under the Act makes clear that this critical area of law will remain muddied until New York's appellate courts, and conceivably the Court of Appeals, decisively rule on the subject.
“Non-reliance” franchise agreement disclaimers are provisions in a franchise agreement, pre-signing questionnaire or separate writing (letter, franchisee “acknowledgement” or franchisee attestation) in which a franchisee acknowledges that, other than representations set forth in the franchisor's Franchise Disclosure Document and franchise agreement, the franchisee did not rely on any representations that may have been made in the franchise sales process regarding a specific subject or subjects, most commonly financial performance representations (how much money, on average, franchised or company-owned units gross or net) or guarantees of success.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.