Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Duty to Defend and the Affirmative Defense
Specific jurisdictional flourishes notwithstanding, the duty to defend analysis typically involves some form of the “eight corners rule,” whereby the four corners of the insurance policy are measured against the four corners of the complaint (and sometimes extrinsic evidence) in order to determine whether or not the claims set out in the complaint trigger the insurer's duty to defend. When the insured itself initiates a suit, it is not uncommon for the defendant to assert affirmative defenses against the insured's complaint. In such a context, courts must determine whether or not a responsive pleading ' taking the form of either a counterclaim or an affirmative defense ' can trigger the duty to defend in the same way that a traditional lawsuit does.
The majority rule is that while allegations contained within a counterclaim may trigger the duty to defend, an affirmative defense asserted in response to the insured's complaint cannot. Courts following this majority rule apply the plain language of the insuring agreement and require that a “suit” for damages be filed against the policyholder. California appears to be the lone jurisdiction that will consider affirmative defenses in analyzing an insurer's duty to defend.
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.