Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

FRCP Amendments: Implications for IP and Patent Troll Litigation

By Mark A. Finkelstein and Meredith L. Williams

The amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) that took effect on Dec. 1, 2015, are already having an impact on IP litigation, especially patent troll lawsuits. To start, the changes to Rule 26 underscore the importance of proportionality in discovery, a notion that is also central to revised Rule 37, which makes it more difficult to obtain sanctions for an opposing party's failure to preserve electronically stored information (ESI). These changes are helping parties control the costs of discovery, and therefore the costs of litigation, particularly in low-stakes cases brought by non-practicing entities. Further, the abrogation of Rule 84 and Form 18 has heightened the pleading standard for non-practicing entities alleging infringement to the plausibility standard required under Twombly and Iqbal. (See, Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009).) In all, these changes have shifted and will continue to shift the legal landscape ' especially for patent troll litigation ' in favor of defendants. Counsel need to understand these new rules and their implications to properly guide their case strategy.

Changes to Rule 26: The Proportionality Standard

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.