Contracting parties routinely use terms like “commercially reasonable” and “best efforts” to describe future performance, sometimes for strategic reasons, but usually because the demands of the deal do not permit the time needed to negotiate what steps will actually occur, or because the parties cannot agree and prefer to table the issue for another day, hoping it will not become a problem.
'Best Efforts,' 'Commercially Reasonable' and Other Terms No One Understands
In this article, the authors explore why vague contractual terms are routinely used, explain how they have been inconsistently interpreted by the courts, and offer some practical tips to minimize the havoc ambiguous terms can wreak.
By
Grant Esposito and Jessica KaufmanThis premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
