Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Last month, in Part One of this article (available at http://bit.ly/1Wq12Em), we examined the overall structure, operation and experience of the SEC's Whistleblower program over the first five years of its operation. In Part Two herein, we take a closer look at how the Office of the Whistleblower (OWB) processes Whistleblower claims, and we examine the claim decisions rendered through April 2016.
A Whistleblower claim must refer to an SEC enforcement action (either administrative or federal court) for which a Notice of Covered Action (a NoCA) was posted on the OWB website. Any claim must be made within 90 days of that posting. Rule 21F-10(b). That posting is the only notice to which a claimant is entitled, and Whistleblowers who missed the posting and filed late have had their claims summarily denied. See Whistleblower Award Proc. No. 2016-5, Exch. Act Rel. No 77368, at 3-4 (Mar. 14, 2016) (“A potential claimant's responsibility includes the obligation to regularly monitor the Commission's web page for NoCA postings and to properly calculate the deadline for filing an award claim.”); see also Whistleblower Award Proc. No. 2014-3, Exch. Act Rel. No 71849, at 5 (Apr. 3, 2014).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.