Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ruling in Jimi Hendrix Trademark Lawsuit
In a trademark suit by Jimi Hendrix's estate, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ruled that the way lettering and an image appear on the alcoholic beverage product “Purple Haze Liquer” didn't create a likelihood of consumer confusion with the estate's trademarks. For example, Georgia federal District Judge J. Randal Hall noted: “Unlike the male in Plaintiffs trademark who is clean shaven and facing forward, the male in [defendant] Tiger Paw's image has a mustache and sideburns and is looking to his right as a stylized 'PH' flows from his head and flames emerge from his back. Furthermore, Plaintiffs' trademark stops slightly below the shoulders of the pictured male, whereas Tiger Paw's image extends to show the male's arms and waist.” But Judge Hall further decided: “Plaintiffs have demonstrated a substantial likelihood of confusion between Plaintiffs' trademarks and (1) the 'jimi' used in the names of Tiger Paw's online platforms and (2) the Jimi Hendrix signature displayed on Tiger Paw's website.'Though Plaintiffs have not demonstrated actual confusion with respect to these marks, the strength of these marks, the similarity between the parties' marks, and Tiger Paw's intent as to Plaintiffs' signature mark are, on balance, enough for the Court to reach this conclusion.”Experience Hendrix LLC v. Tiger Paw Distributors LLC , 416-107.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.