Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Product Liability Law & StrategyLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Third Circuit Limits Scope on Federal Preemption in Aviation Cases

By Steven R. Pounian and Justin T. Green
August 01, 2016

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit's 1999 decision in Abdullah v. American Airlines, 181 F.3d 363 (3d Cir. 1999), dropped a bombshell with its sweeping declaration that the Federal Aviation Act (FA Act) (Pub.L. No. 85-726, 72 Stat. 731 (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. ” 40101-49105)) and its regulations preempt the “entire field” of air safety. While state law historically provided the foundation for nearly all aviation injury and death suits, Abdullah dramatically shifted the landscape, sparking motions to dismiss state law claims and forcing plaintiffs to undertake the often futile task of delineating a federal law basis for their actions. Earlier this year, however, in Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp., Slip op. No. 14-4193 (3d Cir. April 19, 2016), the Third Circuit sharply limited the scope of Abdullah's field preemption ruling, holding that it does not extend to state product liability claims.

Sikkelee concluded that Abdullah “does not govern product liability claims” and that such claims “may proceed using a state standard of care.” Slip op. at 5, 18. The Third Circuit observed that the field preemption declared by Abdullah was limited to “in-air” operations. Id. at 18.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.