Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In its first ruling on the issue, the Court of Appeal of Florida decided that film distribution payments didn't fall under the state's “continuing tort” doctrine for purposes of extending the statute of limitations in a lawsuit alleging tortious interference with business relationship. Effs v. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment Inc., 3D15-1139.
Richard Effs and “Cess” Silvera created Access Pictures to produce the movie Shotttas . In 2005, Silvera gave Sony Pictures an exclusive distribution license for the film. Effs sued Sony in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court in 2012. The trial court determined that Effs' claim, that Sony had interfered with Epps' business relationship with Silvera, was barred under the four-year statute of limitations in Fla. Stat. '95.11(3)(o). The lower court found that Epps' claim accrued on Oct. 30, 2005 ' when Sony Pictures was obligated to make its first payment under the distribution license ' but nevertheless, under the “delayed discovery doctrine,” no later than when Effs learned of the claimed interference via his attorney.
In its affirmance, the court of appeal noted: “[A]dditional distribution payments were merely 'harmful effects from an original, completed act.'”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.