Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It has been this author's experience, while assisting attorneys with the task of challenging custody opinions that either didn't fit with their client's interests or that appeared incongruent with a child's needs, that sometimes a critical step in the process is missed due to superficial cross-examination. Consequently, an important opportunity to educate the court is missed.
Cross-examining attorneys dealing with an adverse evaluator as a witness will attack such deficiencies as bias in the evaluation process, failure to contact certain collateral sources, or the choice by an evaluator not to conduct a home visit (all important factors to address). However, attorneys often fail to go at the actual empirical foundation underpinning the business of forensic experts selecting and recommending which parent should get custody and what the custody and visitation schedule should be.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.