Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b><i> Law Firm CI:</i></b> Inspiring Change

By Marci Borgal Shunk
September 01, 2016

“Only half of companies actually use the competitive intelligence [CI] they collect,” headlined a Harvard Business Review article by CI gurus Benjamin Gilad and Leonard M. Fuld, published earlier this year. According to the authors, four primary factors accounted for at least some of the reasons why certain companies are more successful than others:

  1. The Analyst has “sign-off” authority over major decisions;
  2. Management is open to perspectives varying from internal consensus;
  3. The Analyst's report called for proactive, rather than reactive action; and
  4. The Analyst is involved in product launches.

Though the study drew on responses from more than 20 industries, the findings corroborate with more than a decade of my experience delivering CI to law firms. In short, not enough law firms are using CI to improve their decision-making, and perhaps these findings help to explain why.

Where Law Firm CI Falls Short

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.