Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Marshall Tucker Band's Counsel Can Stay in Trademark Litigation
The U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina refused to disqualify counsel for The Marshall Tucker Band from representing founding member Doug Gray and the band's corporate entity in a suit against the band's former manager. The Marshall Tucker Band Inc. v. M T Industries Inc. (MTI), 7:16-00420. Ron Rainey, who managed the band for more than 25 years, owns a majority share of the group's music publishing company MTI. (Gray has a 20% stake.) The current case against MTI and Rainey involves a trademark dispute over the band's name. Citing the South Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, Rainey moved to disqualify from the litigation the plaintiffs' counsel, Michael Wilkes and Ellen Cheek, who previously performed legal work for MTI until 2010 but since then have served as counsel for the plaintiffs. District Judge Mary Geiger Lewis noted in part: “To the extent their representation of Plaintiffs has included work related to MTI, Plaintiffs' counsel have defined their role as being counsel for Gray, not MTI.” District Judge Lewis later noted: “Put another way, Plaintiffs' counsel's verbal and written declarations to Rainey consistently and unequivocally demonstrated to him that they solely represented the interests of Plaintiffs, and not those of Defendants.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.