Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
We are pleased to announce that Law Journal Newsletters Online is not only getting a new look, but is now fully integrated with ALM and its other offerings, including Law.com, the National Law Journal, Legal Week and many more.
What will this mean for you?
In summary, you will continue to have access to:
What is new?
With our new integration with ALM, your subscription now entitles you to some extra benefits, including:
ACTION REQUIRED:
If your subscription is still active, the only thing you need to do to access the new site once it goes live on October 13 is to reset your password here. That's it!
If you don't reset your password, you will come across a paywall when you go to read a story on the new site. Once you enter your email address, you will have the opportunity to set a new password.
So don't delay! Reset your password now to ensure your seamless access to the new LJN Online, the added benefits of global legal information from ALM, and our continued promise of the highest quality information, and analysis.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.