Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Editor's Note: In last month's newsletter, the author began a discussion of the manufacturer practice of making increased safety features available to purchasers — but only for a price. Those who buy the base model forgo the enhanced safety equipment. This marketing model has been used extensively in many areas, the most familiar probably being the the sale of cars, which might come with anti-lock brakes or rear-view cameras only if the purchaser hands over several thousand dollars above the car's base price. Now, courts are increasingly being asked to determine whether consumers injured by a product that does not have enhanced safety features — because they were not purchased — can hold the manufacturer or others liable for an injury that could have been avoided had those safety features been there. The discussion concludes herein.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.