Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There's a new conservative political administration in Washington, DC, and at press time, as we await the confirmation of a ninth Supreme Court Justice — one who, no doubt, will lean right — questions concerning the changes to come are swirling. From civil rights to health care insurance coverage to a woman's right to choose, attempts to change the status quo are not only possible, but probable.
With this climate in mind, we look at a recent case decided in the Supreme Court of Alabama that concerns questions of the personhood of a nonviable fetus for purposes of a wrongful death action. Stinnett v. Kennedy, 2016 Ala. LEXIS 148 (Alabama, 12/30/16). In Stinnett, the Alabama high court reinstated a dismissed wrongful death cause of action and returned it to the lower court for trial on the issues. This one has the potential not only to increase the risk of liability for obstetricians and other health care providers whose actions adversely affect an unborn child, but also to serve as a vehicle for a realigned Supreme Court to revisit Roe v. Wade.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.