Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Matrimonial StrategistFamily LawFeaturesLitigationLJN Newsletters

Bias in Custody Evaluations

By Jeffrey P. Wittmann
March 01, 2017

There are several foundational components of effective and reliable forensic work:

  1. Fair-minded and even-handed interaction with litigants and their representatives;
  2. Complete and balanced collection of relevant data;
  3. Choice of a method of data collection that is known to produce valid information; and
  4. A sufficiently logical and empirically supported interpretation of what has been learned about a family.

However, evaluator bias can interfere with these noble goals and lead to the court being misled. “Bias,” in the broadest sense, refers to an emotional or cognitive inclination that interferes with an unprejudiced consideration of the information that has been gathered about a family. Bias on the part of an evaluator can introduce distortion in any of the foundational components listed above, increasing the risk that the conclusions that are guiding the court may actually be less than reliable.

Bias manifests in many forms. An evaluator may unconsciously favor mothers, a prejudice that quickly becomes evident when she shows disdain for some of the father's assertions without reason. Another evaluator may set himself/herself up for a preference for the father's position in a case simply by interviewing the father first — and repeatedly — in advance of ever seeing the mother. Still another evaluator may enter an assessment with firmly held preconceptions about what is emotionally healthy and unhealthy for children (e.g., the family bed is bad; young children should be with their mothers; etc.) despite the fact that the empirical research in his or her discipline fails to support such perspectives.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.