Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Feb. 13, 2017, the eve of Valentine's Day, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals extended no love to Louis Vuitton, effectively asserting that it would not rehear the infringement suit against My Other Bag, Inc., denying the en banc request in a brief order. This follows the Second Circuit's affirmation of summary judgment in favor of My Other Bag in December 2016, holding that its brand-spoofing canvas totes didn't amount to trademark or copyright infringement or dilution of Louis Vuitton's intellectual property rights and were properly protected by the parody defense. Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v My Other Bag Inc., No 16-241-cv (2d Cir, Dec. 22, 2016).
The line of reusable bags bear the “My Other Bag” moniker on one side with a printed representation of a luxury brand bag on the other — admittedly “parodying the designer bags we love, but practical enough for everyday life.” The My Other Bag tagline is a clear play on the “My other car is a …” bumper sticker gag, as noted by the district court, which juxtaposes the consumer's cheap product with the expensive designer product. The joke, however, was lost on Louis Vuitton, which has historically been vigilant about pursuing potential infringers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.