Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Many in-house counsel and outside lawyers have experienced something like the following: After navigating your client's defense-side civil case through months or years of contentious discovery, the plaintiff survives summary judgment. Nevertheless, you and your client remain confident that the law and the facts are on your side. There's one big problem, though. Your client faces a jury trial in an unfamiliar jurisdiction, where a jury might be inclined to side with the plaintiff's David over your client's Goliath, and as the old adage goes, “The only certainty with a jury is uncertainty.
Facing the prospect of a trial in a supposedly unfavorable venue, many defendants will agree to settle to avoid an unknown but potentially expensive and reputation-harming verdict. We think there's a better way. We recently tried a defense case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and won a conclusive no-liability, zero-damages jury verdict for an out-of-state corporate defendant sued by a local plaintiff. See Flexuspine, Inc. v. Globus Medical. Here are a few of the strategies we found helpful in that win — many of which we learned from our firm's experience as a plaintiff in the same venue.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.