Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Astonishing computing power lets health care providers harness vast computing resources to drive their business plans, manage treatment protocols and crunch data to boost their practices. However, as we noted in Part One of this article (See http://bit.ly/2uRil70), unintended consequences arise and, in the case of computers, one such consequence is cyber peril.
Losing and compromising data can devastate a health care provider's ability to function or deliver quality care to patients. It can spell the difference between survival or insolvency. Even if cyber-attacks do not cripple a medical practice, they can inflict financial harm through down time, denial of service, lost production, reputational damage or even medical malpractice liability from inaccurate prescriptions, mis-diagnoses or flawed treatment protocols. What can be done to minimize the risks and consequences?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.