Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

All Digital Assets Are Not Legally Equal

The Internet has generated a new set of assets known as “digital assets.” Broadly defined, a digital asset is an electronic record in which an individual has a right or interest. This definition erroneously implies that digital assets should be treated as a legally equivalent set of assets when, in fact, failure to differentiate digital assets into one of three distinct classes will result in legal difficulties.

  1. Class One. The first class of digital assets is contained on a device that is in the owner's control. Usually, this device is a computer or storage device. Class-one digital assets include emails, software, and content and data stored in tangible property, typically a decedent's home computer.
  2. Class Two. A second class of digital assets are access rights and use rights to Internet assets located in a computer or other storage device owned by a person other than the digital asset owner. Class-two digital assets are emails, software, content and data stored in tangible property on a third-party's computer or other tangible property.
  3. Class Three. Class-three digital assets are access and use rights related to Internet assets, but unlike class-two digital assets, class-three digital assets do not have any physical point of presences (i.e., their existence is not dependent upon storage), hence they need not be stored anywhere. A domain name is an example of a class-three digital asset.

These three classifications are based on the location, if any, of the digital asset. Unlike traditional assets, which normally reside in one physical location and under the control of the owner (documents in a home or a bank safety-deposit box), digital assets, such as emails, may reside in multiple physical locations and under the control of more than one party.

Failing to treat digital assets located in the owner's possession (such as the owner's personal computer) differently from digital assets located in the possession of a third party (such as on a Google server) may result in contract breach, copyright infringement and privacy violations, to name a few legal complications.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.