Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Land Use and Planning Litigation United States Supreme Court

Clarity for New York Takings Law

Determining whether or not a government regulation constitutes a “taking” for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment can be a complex endeavor. The recent Second Department decision of Matter of New Creek Bluebelt, Phase 3 (Baycrest Manor Inc.), provides some guidance on three important regulatory takings issues.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Determining whether or not a government regulation constitutes a “taking” for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment can be a complex endeavor. The recent Second Department decision of Matter of New Creek Bluebelt, Phase 3 (Baycrest Manor Inc.), ___ A.D.3d ____, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8042, (Nov. 15, 2017), provides some guidance on three important regulatory takings issues.

This premium content is locked for New York Real Estate Law Reporter subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN REAL ESTATE PRACTICE IN NEW YORK.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical analysis of significant real estate cases in New York
  • Tap into expert guidance from top real estate lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next