Considering Lease Assignment Provisions in the Light of an Enterprise's Broader Business Plan
When entering into or acquiring leases for locations, a retail or restaurant business must consider broader business concerns in negotiating the leases' assignment provisions. Those provisions can inadvertently create major obstacles in the ultimate conveyance or financing of the business.
Assignments not permitted without landlord's consent, with no conditions attached;
Assignments permitted only with landlord's consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, with reasonability only generally defined or, more commonly, not defined at all;
Consent not to be unreasonably withheld, with criteria established as to what constitutes a reasonable refusal to consent, or, conversely, criteria that would require consent if standards or parameters are met; and/or
Assignment not permitted without consent, with certain exceptions which do not require consent or for which consent is presumed granted (sometimes referred to as Permitted Transfers):
To an entity resulting from the merger, consolidation or reorganization of tenant or to the entity benefiting from the sale of substantially all of the tenant's assets;
To an entity of net worth (or some other measured financial standard) equal to or greater than the tenant, or meeting some specific numerical standard (e.g., $1.5 million net worth and $750,000 liquidity); and/or
To an entity that operates a specific number of units similar to tenant's business, having five years' operating experience and a net worth equal to or greater than tenant's.
The Requirement of ConsentRowe v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co.Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N. Y. v Tailored WomanThe Definition of 'Reasonability'i.e.Logan & Logan, Inc. v. Audrey Lane Laufer, LLCAstoria Bedding, Mr. Sleeper Bedding Ctr. v Northside PartnershipDefinitions of 'Assignment'Recapture or Termination Rights
Encumbrances and Leasehold Mortgages
ReleasesChanges in TermsLandlord's Share of Consideration
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The Second Circuit affirmed the lower courts' judgment that a "transfer made … in connection with a securities contract … by a qualifying financial institution" was entitled "to the protection of ... §546 (e)'s safe harbor ...."