Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New York Real Estate Law ReporterColumns & DepartmentsLandlord Tenant LawLitigation

Landlord & Tenant

By ssalkin
August 01, 2018
Unique Circumstances Require Rent Recomputation Matter of Migliaccio v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR)

City Human Rights Law Requires Landlord to Convert Window Into Wheelchair Accessible Entrance

Matter of Marine Holdings, LLC v. New York City Commission on Human Rights

Comment

State and federal law explicitly impose costs of modifications to apartments on the disabled tenant requesting the changes. The New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) states that “[i]t shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for the owner … [t]o refuse to permit, at the expense of a person with a disability, reasonable modifications of existing premises.” N.Y. Exec. Law §296.18(1) (McKinney). The Fair Housing Act (FHA) embodies similar language that clearly identifies the tenant's responsibility. 42 U.S.C. §12182(b)(2)(A)(iii). By contrast, the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) does not specify who bears the costs of modification. Rather, the statute imposes a balancing test and provides four factors to determine whether the landlord would face an “undue burden,” therefore relieving him of modification expenses. N.Y. ADMIN. CODE tit. 8, ch. 1, §8-102(18). While New York courts have not analyzed the meaning of burden in great detail, the Commission on Human Rights (the Commission) has interpreted the NYCHRL to impose the responsibility primarily on housing providers. Once the Commission establishes that the tenant's proposed modification is both reasonable and necessary, the Commission requires the landlord to make the modification at its own cost so long as the requested modification is neither financially burdensome nor architecturally infeasible. The Commission has required the landlord to make the modifications even when the landlord proposed, and the tenant rejected, reasonable alternatives. For instance, in , 2010 WL 8625897, the court required landlord to make a front entrance of the building accessible to the disabled tenant even though the landlord had already made a side entrance accessible. at 2. And in 2012 WL 1657556, at 10, the Commission overturned an ALJ's determination and required landlord to convert a window into a door to accommodate a disabled tenant, despite questions about the effect the conversion would have on the building's structural integrity, and despite landlord's offer to relocate the disabled tenant to an apartment elsewhere in the complex.

“As Is” Clause Does Not Bar Claim That Landlord Intentionally Caused Defective Conditions 

New WTC Retail Owner LLC v. Pachanga, Inc.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment Image

On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.