Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Store closing or liquidation sales are a routine part of Chapter 11 cases involving retail debtors. These sales are consistently authorized by bankruptcy courts, despite lease provisions purporting to forbid them. See, In re R.H. Macy & Co., 170 B.R. 69, 77 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1994). The sales are usually conducted in accordance with “sale guidelines” proposed by the debtor for court approval. Moreover, bankruptcy courts can authorize store closing sales that would otherwise violate state and local laws since federal bankruptcy law may preempt laws that contravene the underlying policies of the Bankruptcy Code. See, In re Shenango Group, Inc., 186 B.R. 623, 628 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1995).
Generally, leases of stores that are closed, unless the lease is a below market lease, are rejected pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code and lease termination damage claims are capped under section 502(b)(6). The primary goal of Chapter 11 is rehabilitation of the debtor. NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 104 S. Ct. 1188, 1197 (1984). In furtherance of this goal, there is a long-standing principle of bankruptcy law that a debtor should not be compelled to perform under a pre-bankruptcy contract that is burdensome to the estate. Id. at 1198.
On June 15, 2018, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California (Judge Vincent Zurzolo) entered an order approving the plan of reorganization of Shiekh Shoes, LLC, in the company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Case No. 2:17-bk-24626-VZ). Shiekh is a retailer of shoes, apparel and accessories. The company commenced its Chapter 11 case on Nov. 29, 2017. At that time, Shiekh operated 125 retail stores in 10 states, and had annual revenues of approximately $180 million.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.