Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Store closing or liquidation sales are a routine part of Chapter 11 cases involving retail debtors. These sales are consistently authorized by bankruptcy courts, despite lease provisions purporting to forbid them. See, In re R.H. Macy & Co., 170 B.R. 69, 77 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1994). The sales are usually conducted in accordance with “sale guidelines” proposed by the debtor for court approval. Moreover, bankruptcy courts can authorize store closing sales that would otherwise violate state and local laws since federal bankruptcy law may preempt laws that contravene the underlying policies of the Bankruptcy Code. See, In re Shenango Group, Inc., 186 B.R. 623, 628 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1995).
Generally, leases of stores that are closed, unless the lease is a below market lease, are rejected pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code and lease termination damage claims are capped under section 502(b)(6). The primary goal of Chapter 11 is rehabilitation of the debtor. NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 104 S. Ct. 1188, 1197 (1984). In furtherance of this goal, there is a long-standing principle of bankruptcy law that a debtor should not be compelled to perform under a pre-bankruptcy contract that is burdensome to the estate. Id. at 1198.
On June 15, 2018, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California (Judge Vincent Zurzolo) entered an order approving the plan of reorganization of Shiekh Shoes, LLC, in the company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Case No. 2:17-bk-24626-VZ). Shiekh is a retailer of shoes, apparel and accessories. The company commenced its Chapter 11 case on Nov. 29, 2017. At that time, Shiekh operated 125 retail stores in 10 states, and had annual revenues of approximately $180 million.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.