Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the Courts
High Court Rules Against SFO in Barclays Appeal
In mid-2012, the UK's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) initiated a criminal investigation into Barclays PLC (Barclays) in relation to the company's October 2008 $3 billion loan to the State of Qatar. Barclays denied that the loan was connected to a Qatar investment that ultimately aided the company in dodging a government bailout.
In June 2017, the SFO charged the company, along with four individuals (former Chief Executive Officer of Barclays Plc; former Executive Chairman of Investment Banking and Investment Management in the Middle East and North Africa for Barclays Capital; former Chief Executive of Barclays Wealth and Investment Management; and former European Head of Financial Institutions Group for Barclays Capital) with conspiracy to commit fraud. Barclays Bank Plc was later charged with unlawful financial assistance. These charges against both Barclays Plc and Barclays Bank Plc were dismissed by the Crown Court in May 2018, after which the SFO sought an appeal with the High Court of England and Wales. On Oct 26, 2018, the High Court refused to reinstate the fraud charges.
The capital raising trials for the individuals charged will proceed as scheduled in January 2019. Further, the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission are also investigating Barclays with respect to this matter.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.