Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A few months ago, I left the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division (the Division) for private practice at Winston & Strawn. I spent nearly 10 years as a prosecutor and supervisor in the Division, where I prosecuted numerous international and domestic cartels. During my time at the Division, I met hundreds of defense attorneys, including solo practitioners, boutique litigators, large law firm lawyers, former public defenders, former assistant U.S. Attorneys and former Division prosecutors.
With so many seemingly well-credentialed attorneys, it can be difficult for corporate counsel to determine who is the correct attorney for a particular representation, especially because no attorney is perfect and every representation presents new and unique challenges for even the most seasoned practitioner. Corporate counsel therefore should be aware of the following 10 common mistakes that practitioners make when representing clients in criminal antitrust matters.
Unlike reactive crime, in a criminal antitrust matter, your counsel's first conversation with the prosecutor is likely not going to be at arraignment — it will be shortly after the corporation or an executive received a subpoena or was visited by the FBI (e.g., for a search or an unanticipated interview). Very rarely does the Division charge an alleged antitrust offender without first interacting with counsel.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.