Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
PG&E Corporation (Holdco) and its subsidiary, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (the Utility and together with Holdco, PG&E) announced on Jan. 13, 2019 that it expects to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on or around Jan. 29, 2019, right around the conclusion of a mandatory 15-day notice requirement under California law. See, Form 8-K of PG&E Corp. and Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (Jan. 13, 2019). Such a filing would represent the second time PG&E resorted to protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
PG&E filed for bankruptcy on April 6, 2001 and emerged three years later, on April 12, 2004. See, Case No. 01-30923-DM (Bankr. N.D. Cal.). The challenges PG&E has faced since wildfires began consuming large swaths of California are well known and has fueled speculation about a bankruptcy filing. But less well understood and appreciated are the legal and regulatory issues confronting PG&E and other similarly situated California utilities. As we'll see, those legal and regulatory issues present critical complications in a potential second PG&E bankruptcy.
PG&E, incorporated in California in 1905, is one of the largest combined natural gas and electrical energy companies in the United States. Based in San Francisco, it employs nearly 20,000 people. Its primary business is the transmission and delivery of energy — both natural gas and electricity — to nearly 16 million customers in Northern and Central California. The rates PG&E charges its customers are predominantly set by its principal regulator, the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.