Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinFeaturesCriminal LawForeign Corrupt Practices ActLitigationRegulationWhite Collar Crime

Carrot Replaces Stick: Corporate Crime Enforcement In the Trump Administration

By Joseph F. Savage, Jr. and Marielle Sanchez
May 01, 2019

Elections have consequences, and the election of President Trump has resulted in a significant shift in law enforcement priorities. Corporate enforcement activity is at lows not seen in decades, despite an overall increase of almost 40% in federal criminal cases. This is a product of a change in priorities, both in terms of types of offenses and types of offender: more focus on prosecuting individuals instead of entities and more emphasis on drug, violence, and immigration offense rather than business crimes. In a couple of areas where there may be increased business crime enforcement activity reflected in some of the aggregate numbers — Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and crypto currency — the actual cases nonetheless reflect the administration's reordered priorities. So, for the time being, there will be almost unprecedented opportunity to achieve favorable resolutions for corporate clients.

The New Policies By the Numbers

In April 2017, then Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Trevor N. McFadden announced at the ACI Annual FCPA Conference that the Department of Justice (DOJ) was going to be focusing on violent crime, and in September 2018, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a memo saying that the DOJ has "set clear goals … reducing violent crime, homicides, opioid prescription and drug overdose deaths." These are primarily individual offenses, so by shifting resources to these areas, enforcement activity against corporate entities looks to be reduced.

For those corporate crimes DOJ chose to pursue, it also signaled a more conciliatory approach to resolutions. In March 2018, at the ABA White Collar Crime National Institute Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein declared that the DOJ wanted to "avoid imposing penalties that disproportionately punish innocent employees, shareholders, customers and other stakeholders" and promised that the DOJ would try to stop multiple law enforcement agencies from "piling on" corporate fines. Section 1-12.100 of the United States Attorneys' Manual was updated reflecting this approach.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.