Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the Courts
Seventh Circuit Distinguishes Between Truth and Truthiness
True or false? This question we learn as children presents a simple binary,, but the distinction is rarely that simple. From the President's “alternative facts” to Stephen Colbert's “truthiness” – there remains a spectrum between literal truths to technical truths that nevertheless ring false in certain lights. Recently, the Seventh Circuit explored the distinction between actual truth and technical truths in the case of United States v. Batmagnai Chogsom and held that the line between truth and falsehood may lie in the mind of the utterer.
At a first glance, Chogsom is a relatively unremarkable prosecution of two individuals for the exporting stolen vehicles and engaging in a scheme to structure financial transactions in a manner that would elude federal financial reporting requirements. Initially, after a six day jury trial involving twenty nine witnesses, a federal jury convicted Mr. Nikolay Tantchev of a series of charges relating to the stolen cars and using false documents in connection with the financial scheme. The same jury acquitted his associate, Mr. Batmagnai Chogsom of these charges but convicted him of making a false statement to an IRS agent and sentenced him to three years of probation. Mr. Chogsom appealed his conviction.
This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.