Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the Courts
New Developments In Och-Ziff FCPA Settlement As Brooklyn Judge Grants Victim Status to Former Investors In Restitution Claim over Lost African Mining Venture
Oz Africa Management, LLC (Oz Africa), a wholly-owned subsidiary of New York-based hedge fund manager Och-Ziff Capital Management Group, LLC (Och-Ziff), has had a key ruling made against it by U.S. District Court Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis as it seeks final resolution of the plea deal arising from both companies' $412 million Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2016.
Oz Africa has formally asked Judge Garaufis to reconsider his Aug. 29, 2019 ruling granting victim status to around fifty former shareholders in Canadian mining company Africo Resources Ltd (Africo) under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. §3663A (MVRA) for losses arising from a mining venture in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Judge Garaufis' ruling, unsealed on September 3, relates to events occurring over 10 years ago when agents related to Oz Africa bribed Congolese judges to secure favorable court rulings as it sought control over the Kalukundi copper and cobalt mine over which Africo held exclusive rights in the DRC. The former investors claim to be owed up to $1.8 billion in restitution, arguing that the FCPA settlement has failed to hold Och-Ziff fully accountable for their losses. The application for restitution was opposed by both Och-Ziff and the Government and further complicates the final resolution of the deal reached between Och Ziff, Oz Africa and U.S. prosecutors over three years ago.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.