Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the Courts
New Developments In Och-Ziff FCPA Settlement As Brooklyn Judge Grants Victim Status to Former Investors In Restitution Claim over Lost African Mining Venture
Oz Africa Management, LLC (Oz Africa), a wholly-owned subsidiary of New York-based hedge fund manager Och-Ziff Capital Management Group, LLC (Och-Ziff), has had a key ruling made against it by U.S. District Court Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis as it seeks final resolution of the plea deal arising from both companies' $412 million Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2016.
Oz Africa has formally asked Judge Garaufis to reconsider his Aug. 29, 2019 ruling granting victim status to around fifty former shareholders in Canadian mining company Africo Resources Ltd (Africo) under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. §3663A (MVRA) for losses arising from a mining venture in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Judge Garaufis' ruling, unsealed on September 3, relates to events occurring over 10 years ago when agents related to Oz Africa bribed Congolese judges to secure favorable court rulings as it sought control over the Kalukundi copper and cobalt mine over which Africo held exclusive rights in the DRC. The former investors claim to be owed up to $1.8 billion in restitution, arguing that the FCPA settlement has failed to hold Och-Ziff fully accountable for their losses. The application for restitution was opposed by both Och-Ziff and the Government and further complicates the final resolution of the deal reached between Och Ziff, Oz Africa and U.S. prosecutors over three years ago.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.