Follow Us Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bankruptcy Contracts Insurance Litigation Litigation

D&O Policy ‘Bankruptcy Exclusion’ Held To Be an Unenforceable ‘Ipso Facto’ Clause

The new decision is significant because lawsuits against former (and current) officers and directors of debtors commonly are brought, as here, by trusts established under plans of reorganization. Because insurance policies often are the only viable source of recovery for the claims asserted in such lawsuits, this decision potentially opens a pathway to creditor recovery in other similar matters.


Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Among the more mundane aspects of Chapter 11 bankruptcy analysis — whether pre-petition planning by a prospective debtor or post-petition evaluation by creditors — is the review of contracts which may be deemed “executory” under 11 U.S.C. §365. This is because a debtor, pursuant to that statute’s subsection (a), and subject to certain restrictions not relevant here, may “assume” valuable contracts or “reject” those which are financially disadvantageous.

To continue reading,
become a free ALM digital reader

Benefits include:

*May exclude premium content

Read These Next