TRO Bid in Arts Case Results in COVID-19 Rebuke from Judge

Read These Next

• 

  Recent Court Views on “Making Available” Controversy in Copyright Infringement

  By Stan Soocher

  Federal courts have long disagreed over whether the unauthorized “making available” of a plaintiff’s works to the public is sufficient to constitute copyright infringement under the U.S. Copyright Act. Two June District Court decisions demonstrated the differences between the views of the Fourth and Ninth Circuits.

  Read More ›

• 

  Does Insurance Policy Cover Media Office COVID-19 Closure?

  By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes

  According to news reports, and judging from the plethora of lawsuits filed seeking insurance coverage for lost income incurred as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, insurance companies are for the most part denying claims for business interruption losses. The type of insurance claim at issue may make a difference.

  Read More ›

• 

  Commentary: Claims Filing Time Issues on Copyright Ownership from Everly Bros. Case

  By J. Alexander Lawrence

  Don and Phil Everly’s flawless harmonies that resulted in a string of hits in the 1950s and '60s regrettably ended in acrimony. The Sixth Circuit recently issued a decision in a dispute between Phil’s heirs and Don over copyright ownership of the No. 1 hit “Cathy’s Clown,” in which concurring Judge Eric E. Murphy raised important questions about when the statute of limitations should begin to run in copyright cases and whether courts have been correctly applying the law.

  Read More ›

• 

  Counsel Concerns: Ice Cube’s Big3 Suit Against League’s Lawyers Ends Quietly

  By Dan Packel

  Three-on-three basketball league Big3, co-owned by hip hop artist and actor Ice Cube, quietly abandoned a lawsuit accusing the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan of putting its lucrative relationship with the Republic of Qatar ahead of its attorney-client obligations to the fledgling sports project.

  Read More ›