Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
City of New York v. Airbnb Inc. NYLJ 4/2/20, p. 21, col. 3 Supreme Ct., N.Y. Cty. (Lawrence, Special Master)
In actions brought by the city against Aribnb, the city sought user records of individuals whose postings on Airbnb's website did not result in a completed reservation for an unlawful short-term tenancy. A special master held that the city was entitled to the user records.
The city contends that unlawful short term tenancies put tourists and first responders at the risk of injury because of the failure of units to comply with the stringent fire and safety feature required for short-term occupancy buildings. The city also contended that even though the advertisements posted by these users did not result in reservations, the advertisements created liability for users because they violate advertising laws codified in the Multiple Dwelling Law and the city's administrative code.
After in camera review of USB drives submitted by Airbnb, the special master determined that the city was entitled to the user records. The special master noted that Airbnb might otherwise deactivate or remove the accounts of users, which would result in the equivalent of spoliation of evidence. The special master also noted that the user records might assist the city in identifying aliases of illegal hosts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.