Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Legal Tech: Six Years of Tracking E-Discovery Trends and Providers
As an independent analyst that covers the legal industry, I have the privilege of learning from an array of market leaders and sharing their perspectives with the community to help promote progress. With that objective in mind, for the past six years, I have been producing the E-Discovery Unfiltered report to identify pricing patterns and preferences in electronic discovery, highlight projected investments in the sector, gauge the impact of the cloud, track shifting preferences in outsourcing and remote review, understand vendor selection criteria, and focus on the need for international ediscovery, among other trends. Ultimately, my goal is to spotlight the challenges associated with navigating an expanding data landscape and offer crowdsourced insights on charting the most productive path forward.
Between Jan. 22 – March 6, 2020, I personally interviewed 27 individuals responsible for e-discovery decision-making, including eight in-house lawyers, 11 in-house administrative e-discovery leaders, and eight law firm partners: 100% of whom develop and implement ediscovery processes, and select e-discovery tools and vendors; while 96% influence their organization's ediscovery budget. Of the 19 respondents from corporations, seven are in life sciences, three are in insurance, three are in telecommunications, two are in financial services, two are in manufacturing, and two are in technology. 89% work for companies with revenues that exceed $10 billion and have over 10,000 employees. All eight of the law firm partners work for large law firms and serve as primary e-discovery counsel.
E-Discovery Is Expanding
The most frequently cited trends for 2020 related to the broad application of analytics, the impact of artificial intelligence, and the challenges associated with interpreting an array of complex data types. "Companies are starting to apply analytics across matters, rather than on specific cases," said one in-house lawyer. "[We are seeing an] increased use of artificial intelligence in discovery and contract review," added an in-house discovery professional. And, according to a law firm partner: "Managing social, mobile, and cloud data represents the most important area of change," particularly given the need to search and interpret emojis, ephemeral messages, and non-custodial persistent chats.
Corporate Legal and Law Firm Teams Are Investing In E-Discovery
The leading areas of investment noted for 2020 were software, training, data mapping and automation. "Cloud-based review software is our biggest investment in 2020," said a participating in-house lawyer. "We are investing in education for our team members and in data mapping," added an in-house ediscovery professional.
More Law Departments Are Managing E-Discovery In-House
Those investments in education are giving in-house teams the ability to handle more e-discovery activities themselves. In fact, 95% of corporate respondents agreed that legal departments are bringing more of the ediscovery process in house. 91% of corporate participants also highlighted that the law department's internal team alone typically selects both software vendors and outside service providers.
The Pandemic is Impacting Preferences
When enlisting outside support, prior to the pandemic, 58% of corporate respondents and 50% of law firm partners expressed a willingness to work with companies that offer remote document review. The current crisis has generally prompted many to reconsider their concerns with this approach, assuming an appropriate level of security: 37% of corporate respondents and 38% of law firm partners said that they are open to off-shoring their ediscovery, while 16% of corporate respondents expressed a willingness to work with a provider that outsources elements of its ediscovery.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.