Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, decided that a dispute between personal managers and the country pop artist Tegan Marie should go to arbitration. 5th of July LLC v. Thomas, 3:19-cv-00994. The owners of the affiliated management companies 5th of July (based in Tennessee) and Sweety High (based in California) say they obtained "a major record contract and publishing deal at the age of thirteen" for the artist. They have since sued Tegan Marie and her parents for quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. The plaintiffs claim to have advanced "$3 million in unreimbursed funds from their company" to further the artist's career, but according to the complaint, she fired them in 2019 with three years left in the management term. The plaintiffs argue that an arbitration clause in the management agreement doesn't apply to Tegan Marie's parents because the agreement was with the artist. But Chief District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. explained: "Under Tennessee law, it has been held that, even where the arbitration agreements do[] not expressly state that non-signatories may compel arbitration, a non party can compel arbitration if 'the arbitration agreement does not limit arbitrations only to parties to the agreement.'" The chief judge added: "Similarly, under California law, '[t]hird parties may enforce a contract with an arbitration provision … where they are intended third party beneficiaries or are assigned rights under the contract."
*****
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.