Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In In re Smith, (B.A.P. 10th Cir., Aug. 18, 2020), the U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently joined the majority of circuit courts of appeals in finding that a creditor seeking a judgment of nondischargeability must demonstrate that the injury caused by the prepetition debtor was both willful and malicious under Section 523(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Michael Smith, an attorney, worked for 22 years for Equity Title Insurance Company (Equity Title) and served as Equity Title's chief operating officer and general counsel. In 2008, First American Title Co. and an affiliate (First American), a competitor of Equity Title, acquired a majority interest in Equity Title and changed Smith's title to "State Underwriting and Legal Counsel." In 2012, First American and Equity Title officially completed their merger.
Before the merger, in 2004, Smith had entered into an employment agreement with Equity Title that contained a non-compete clause and a non-solicitation clause. After the merger, Smith did not sign a new employment agreement with First American. First American, however, regularly required its employees to review and acknowledge the First American Employee Handbook and Code of Ethics and Conduct online; employees would receive a prompt to access the Employee Handbook and Code of Ethics, and a further prompt to clink an "I Acknowledge" button, which would confirm that they had read and agreed to the terms thereof. Smith did not deny making such an acknowledgment.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?