Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

How U.S. Court Ruled Whether France's Right of Publicity Law Is Descendible

By Stan Soocher
December 01, 2020

Battles over celebrities' estates often end up in litigation, but a recent court ruling involving the estate of French oceanic explorer, environmentalist and documentary filmmaker Jacques Cousteau included a not-often-seen right of publicity consideration: how a U.S. court determines whether right-of-publicity protection in another nation is descendible. The Cousteau Society Inc. v. Cousteau, 3:19-cv-1106 (D.Conn. 2020).

Protection of the right of publicity varies globally, either directly, through related laws or not at all. Jacques-Yves Cousteau, who died in 1997, had assigned the exclusive international rights in his intellectual property to The Cousteau Society (TCS), a Virginia-based not-for-profit formed back in the 1970s to safeguard Cousteau's legacy. The exclusive rights included to Cousteau's name, voice, likeness and signature, as well as trademarks. In addition to Cousteau's name, the registered trademarks include the name of his boat "Calypso" and the phrase "The Journey Continues."

Cousteau's granddaughter Celine Cousteau founded The Celine Cousteau Film Fellowship (CCFF) to create multimedia productions focused on environmental and socio-cultural matters. TCS filed suit over CCFF's documentary production Celine Cousteau, The Adventure Continues, described in the complaint as "retrac[ing Cousteau's] steps. Exploring how the planet has changed since his epic adventures." The TCS lawsuit also alleged CCFF was using Jacques Cousteau intellectual property without permission to raise funding through CCFF's website.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders Image

Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?