Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Intellectual Property Litigation Trademarks

Unseating Inelegant Notions of Product Design Functionality

In Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc., the 9th Circuit considered whether or not the or not the best-selling piece of furniture ever is functional.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc., 963 F.3d 859 (9th Cir. June 25, 2020), the 9th Circuit considered whether or not the or not the best-selling piece of furniture ever, the Aeron chair, and another iconic seating design, the Eames Aluminum Group chairs are functional. No doubt the reader has seen the chairs — he or she may even be sitting in one while reading this article. The court clarified, in effect, that such complex designs are indeed more than the sums of their parts and cannot be reduced to constituent elements unless the combination makes the whole more functional.

To continue reading,
become a free ALM digital reader

Benefits include:

*May exclude premium content

Read These Next