Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
With 2020, with its unprecedented and unforeseeable economic devastation, now in the rearview mirror, consumers face 2021 not as the dawn of a new day (cue the hallelujah choir), but with a sense of foreboding and the looming specter of total financial collapse (cue the John Williams score — Jaws, not Superman). As in past times of economic turmoil, it is anticipated that there will be a surge in residential foreclosures, debt collection activity, and the resultant wave of consumer bankruptcy filings.
Simply stated, the current way of practicing bankruptcy is not going to cut it for 2021.
With a relatively steady flow of bankruptcy filings, and a predictable level of personal financial angst (such as we have become accustomed to over the past 10-12 years), it is easy for consumer bankruptcy practitioners to become complacent. Many attorneys consider the bankruptcy discharge to be the ultimate goal of a consumer bankruptcy case, and the best way to protect the consumer client. But the new wave of bankruptcy debtors will be experiencing a new, post-pandemic, financial crisis — sudden, total, affecting all family wage earners, with diminishing hope for short term recovery. And as in any time of financial crisis, they will have encountered significant financial fraud, mistreatment and mistakes.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.