Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It has been said by many, in many different ways and in many different settings, that "desperate times call for desperate measures." Practically since its enactment more than 40 years ago, that idiom has been the foundation of various business and legal strategies employed by those clinging to the Bankruptcy Code while pressing an argument in court for some form of relief. Indeed, the Bankruptcy Code is, by all accounts, a safe harbor for businesses and people in search of a "fresh start," a venue to liquidate in an orderly fashion or just the opportunity to demonstrate that it is worth saving through a balance sheet and/or operational restructuring. Current times are desperate indeed, as the impact of the pandemic rages on and, in its path leaves many businesses and industries demolished or, at best, severely impaired. Once again, the Bankruptcy Code has been called upon to provide relief to those in dire need, relief that could certainly be called extraordinary in many respects.
In relevant part, section 305(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that "[t]he court, after notice and a hearing, may … suspend all proceedings in a case under … [T]itle [11], at any time if — the interests of creditors and the debtor would be better served by such dismissal or suspension." Traditionally, courts have interpreted section 305(a) to apply to a suspension of all proceedings, rather than to certain proceedings. See, e.g., In re Rookery Bay, No. 95-04781 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 1995) (granting the debtor's motion for abstention, holding that it was "appropriate to suspend any further proceeding in the involuntary case" until the debtor's pending appeal of the creditor's judgment was resolved); In re Milestone Educ. Inst., No. 93-20747 (Bankr. D. Mass. May 25, 1994) (finding that a creditor's "motion for relief from stay for cause and concomitant suspension of all activity" would, among other things, permit the state appellate court to "address novel and unsettled issues of receivership law").
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.