Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Navigating Defamation Litigations Today
Tensions erupted both on and off the set of a Newsmax TV segment when MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell bolstered his claim of a rigged presidential election with accusations directed at the integrity of Dominion Voting Systems. Lindell's allegations not only caused an anchor to storm off set, but also highlighted the potential consequences of Lindell's words for both himself and Newsmax. What's clear from Dominion's public threat of legal action followed by swiftly filing suit against Lindell for $1.3 billion is that defamation cases are no longer privately litigated offscreen. US Dominion Inc. v. My Pillow Inc., 1:21-cv-00445 (D.D.C.) Instead, social media and the 24-hour news cycle provide a multitude of platforms for critical voices, and companies no longer risk complacency in response to the publication of potentially false information.
The tense political climate has provided ample material for defamation claims, though the entertainment and media industries have long been hotbeds for these. Dominion is no stranger to defamation suits — it recently brought companion cases against Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani for their repeated assertions that the company was created in order to help Hugo Chavez rig elections in Venezuela and support mass election fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. US Dominion Inc. v. Giuliani, 1:21-cv-00213 (D.D.C. ); US Dominion Inc. v. Powell, 1:21-cv-00040 (D.D.C.).
Another election technology provider, Smartmatic USA, filed a $2.7 billion defamation suit against Fox News, its anchors and former President Trump's lawyers. Smartmatic USA Corp. v. Fox Corp., 151136/2021 (Sup. Ct., NY County). The complaint points to allegations of election fraud broadcast on Fox programs that could jeopardize Smartmatic's business in a multibillion-dollar industry. Fox News since cancelled Lou Dobbs' nightly show, one of the anchors central to the claim. While these cases are still in their early stages, the filing of these complaints reflects the high stakes nature and potential fallout from defamation cases today.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.