Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
After a two-day bench trial in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, District Judge Aleta A. Trauger found in favor of Don Everly in his 2017 declaratory action against the estate of his brother Phil over authorship of the Everly Brothers 1960 hit "Cathy's Clown." Everly v. Everly, 3:17-cv-01440. In 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit had decided there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Don "plainly and expressly repudiated" Phil as a co-author at least three years before Phil's family launched a counterclaim alleging co-authorship in response to Don's lawsuit. Everly v. Everly, 958 F.3d 442 (6th Cir. 2020). If there had been express repudiation, the family's co-authorship counterclaim would be barred under the Copyright Act's three-year statute of limitations. From 1960 to 1980, Phil and Don were both credited on record releases and business documents as "Cathy's Clown" co-authors. Phil and Don also said publicly that they co-wrote the song because, as District Judge Trauger explained it, Don "was told by [Everly music publisher's Acuff-Rose co-founder] Wesley Rose that it would make the Everly Brothers more popular if the public believed that they wrote their songs together." But in 1980, at Don's behest Phil signed a "Release and Assignment" stating that he transferred to Don "all of [Phil's] rights, interests and claim in and to ['Cathy's Clown'], including rights to royalties and his claim as co-composer, effective June 1, 1980." In an enlightening look at the Everly Brothers' historically stormy relationship, District Judge Trauger observed: "The defendants portray Don as a bully who repeatedly badgered Phil to give up his rights to 'Cathy's Clown.' That portrait, however, is inconsistent with the apparently undisputed fact that Phil and Don had essentially no direct contact from the time the duo broke up in 1973 until the telephone call that resulted in Phil's signing the 1980 Release. A single telephone call does not qualify as pestering. The court accepts that Don was imperious and difficult to work with, and Don's being a bully would explain in part why he would repudiate Phil's contribution to writing 'Cathy's Clown,' if indeed he made any such contribution. But the story about Don's bullying does not explain why Phil would sign the 1980 Release unless Phil understood that Don was claiming sole authorship of 'Cathy's Clown' and that Phil would no longer be credited as a co-author of the work." The district judge then decided that Phil's family's co-authorship counterclaim was time-barred because Don expressly repudiated co-authorship by Phil in a letter and phone call to Phil prior to Phil's signing of the June 1980 Release and Assignment.
*****
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.